Solutions
Built for software delivery. Designed to go further.
TaskForce runs software delivery today. That's the proven wedge. The underlying pattern, governed work through validated checkpoints with the reasoning kept, isn't specific to code. We mark clearly what's proven and what's still exploration.
By team
One proven use, and where it could extend
Software engineering is the first team we've proven. Everything else here is the same idea applied elsewhere, labelled honestly as exploration, not a shipped product.
Engineering
ProvenTurn an outcome into a governed run - spec, approach, breakdown, execution through your coding agents, QA - with a human on every decision.
Product
Turning outcomes into specs, acceptance criteria and sequenced work is a product job too. Not proven as a standalone workflow yet.
Operations
The same governed, auditable checkpoints could structure operational delivery. Exploratory - we haven't shipped it.
Marketing
Campaigns are reviewed, approved work with dependencies and a paper trail. A natural fit in theory, unproven in practice.
Client services
Client deliverables that need review and sign-off could run on the same rails. Exploratory.
By use case
Or by the job to be done
The same governed run, pointed at one job. Each is marked for what ships today and what's part of the Planned orchestration. No overselling.
Compare
How TaskForce sits next to what you use
We lead with what each tool does well, then show what a governed delivery layer adds. Trackers and coding agents are complements, not competitors.
Project trackers
Coding agents
Why the pattern travels
Any team that ships reviewed work
A governed run (an artifact produced, reviewed and explicitly approved before the next step) isn't specific to engineering. It fits any team whose work is decided in stages, reviewed by a human, and worth remembering afterwards. We'd rather prove that team by team than claim it.
Start where it's proven
Run your first software delivery workflow today, and tell us where else the pattern should go.